jump to navigation

Early Porn Memories January 21, 2011

Posted by Dev in Musings.
Tags: , , , ,
trackback

Not from the Sears Catalog, but a hunky guy in undies, nonetheless!

Over on the Chastity Forum, mikecb posted a link to an article from CNN which sparked an interesting discussion about porn and masturbation. I particularly liked this comment from Red:

Back when I was in my teens, the only way to get porn was to go into a shop and buy it – either that, or mail order. Both ways involved some effort and potential embarrassment, and of course cost money.

That may be true, but for those of us who realized we liked looking at pictures of half-nekkid men and women well before our teens—we weren’t in any position to go into a shop and buy porn because: a) we were too young; b) we didn’t know where the shops were (and had no way to get there even if we did); and c) we didn’t have any money. So what was an eight year old perv to do? Turn to the Sears Catalog, of course!

The Sears Catalog arrived at our house three times a year: spring/summer, fall/winter and the Christmas Catalog, dubbed the Wish Book in 1968. You could buy just about anything from the catalog, ranging from adding machines to xylophones. Many pages were devoted to men’s and women’s underwear, fueling early fantasies in our fevered brains.

Classic, from the 1966 Christmas Catalog

I remember looking at both the pictures of men and women—maybe the women had a slight edge. All those foundation garments and girdles and bras—I didn’t know hot or sexy but they certainly caused a stirring in my mind. The men I remember being more bland and posed. A possible reason? I came across this tidbit from a former Sears underwear model:

There is a reason that the male models in the print ads appear to be eunuchs. All male underwear models were required to wear dance belts under the briefs or shorts being modeled. When worn, this impossibly snug garment obscured any bulge the model possessed. It was very uncomfortable, and it rigidly controlled the genitalia. The photographers were instructed that not a “dimple was to be seen.”

Apparently there was a scandal in 1975 where something was peeking out of a pair of boxer shorts. The head of the guy’s penis or a blemish? Conclusions are inconclusive although Sears denies that it is a penis. A spokesperson says it is “a blemish introduced during the reproduction process.” I wasn’t aware of this until today—by 1975 my Sears underwear gazing days were long over. But clearly, I was not the only person out there carefully scrutinizing the underwear ads. The picture above is from the 1971 catalog which was also a little past my prime—I had a boyfriend by then. The real thing was so much better—although he never wore any goldenrod matched sets. ‘Tis a pity.

What fun!

Another book I furtively studied for hours was entitled The Importance of Wearing Clothes by Lawrence Langner. It had a chapter—complete with pictures—on nudism. Oh, how I loved to look at those happy people frolicking in the woods and fields! When Ab and I started discussing naturism (nudism) I realized this was a very long-held fantasy for me. Chastity popped into my head overnight, but naturism went back decades. It was a dream that was finally realized in 1998. What a great day that was!

As for porn movies, I have a memory of going to see Deep Throat at the theater with my boyfriend although details are fuzzy. Reading up on the film, I see that it came out in 1972, which would have been my senior year in high school. He was away at college so maybe we went together when he was home on break? Thanksgiving or Christmas? Either way, it obviously didn’t make much of an impact.

The one movie I do remember clearly is The Story of O which came out in 1975. I went to see it on a date with some guy I met at a frat party—I have absolutely no memory of his name. He invited me to “the movies” not specifying what we’d see. On one hand I remember being entranced by the movie: whips, chains, the scene near the end with O at the ball, naked except for her mask—it was unbelievably erotic. On the other hand I was royally pissed at my date, springing this on me without warning! Clearly his ulterior motive was to get me completely turned on and then seduce me. It didn’t work, though, because there was something about him that just didn’t click for me. He was very angry and that was—wisely, I realize, thinking back—the end of that romance.

A few years later I found a copy of the book on the shelf at a friend’s house. I read it in one afternoon, furtively, I suspect because I still harbored the thought that “good girls don’t read stuff like this.”

And maybe that is an advantage of the Internet as “the great porn equalizer.” By making porn as common as grass, we’ve realized that it is a pretty universal activity for men and women to look at and enjoy porn. I’ve realized I like erotic stories and pictures of men (probably not all that porny, as things go, but they fuel my imagination). Ab tends to like stories, too. But having so much available at our fingertips…some days I long for the simplicity of shapely derrières in the Sears catalog.

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Wishful4 - January 21, 2011

What memories! I can vividly remember, as a youngster, hiding to get a peek at the undy section of the Sears catalog.

devotedlvr - January 21, 2011

Our house had a long hall on the second floor. I’d sit in the corner at the end of the hall, gazing at pictures for ages. I always kept one finger marking the toy section, however, so if a parent came along, I could quickly flip the pages and pretend I was looking at Barbies. 🙂

D

2. tcs - January 21, 2011

When Phil Donahue covered kinky guests in the 1980’s, that was a big deal to me. It wasn’t quite so exploitative. Geraldo did this too, but Phil was on when I got home from school.

devotedlvr - January 21, 2011

Explain to me Phil Donahue and kinky guests? I never watched the show. Sounds intriguing, though!

D

3. tcs - January 21, 2011

He was a TV talk show pioneer, and covered subjects no one else would. He started in Chicago and then was syndicated. He was a show man for sure, but he wasn’t so over the top like Springer, and was usually sympathetic. He would have drag queens, straight cross dressers, pro dommes, etc. One time he wore a skirt himself on the show.

There are some old snips on Youtube, but not a lot.

devotedlvr - January 21, 2011

Ah, thanks. I’ve heard of Phil Donahue, of course, but never watched the show and didn’t realize the variety of guests he hosted. Thanks for the info, I’ve learned something new today.

D

4. nuts4belle - January 21, 2011

Agreed. Much more imagination was needed back then. Porn overload now.

5. mosthandysub - January 21, 2011

Great memories!! Let’s not forget National Geographic and anatomy books at the library!

devotedlvr - January 22, 2011

National Geo, yes — although the bare-breasted women who showed up in their photos didn’t usually have perky tits like the Sears ladies did. 🙂

I never looked at anatomy books at the library. I did like the vinyl pages in the encyclopedia where you could see the layers of the body — bones, muscles, blood vessels, etc. Those weren’t particularly erotic though. Just interesting to me.

D

6. Jamie - January 23, 2011

Thanks for the memory of “The Story of O”. I found that book and realized that I wasn’t the only person in the world who fantasized about this stuff. Never mind that I was a guy, I wanted to *be* O so badly.

Part of what got me to come out to my wife was looking at the Victoria’s Secret catalogs that would show up at our house. I realized that I was not going to go to my grave in the same manner as I had been an adolescent, lusting over catalogs. So thanks for the memories of the Sear’s catalog as well.

Jamie

devotedlvr - January 25, 2011

Victoria’s Secret always has been a little over the top for me. I prefer the wholesomeness of the Sears ladies. 🙂 I found another site, Hips and Curves, that has some nice models, too.

http://www.hipsandcurves.com/plus-size-lingerie/default.aspx

7. pateinduced - January 25, 2011

Fun memories!

Days-of-the-week panties, then bikinis.

1975 seems late for the exposed “little boy” in the Sears catalog…? I verified the evil deed the moment I heard the news. The ‘big deal’ about it to me was he did hang a little farther than average. No, it was not a blemish; but it did hang straight down–pushed between his legs. For a guy, the specified comment in conversation was: “no big deal.”

8. devotedlvr - January 25, 2011

Ah, someone who remembers the “controversy”! Thanks for your comment.

D

9. Cue the Moms in 3…2…1… « the key is on my nipple ring - March 7, 2012

[…] on Sears: As I was typing this I reminded myself of this post when I reminisced about looking at “dirty pictures” in the Sears Catalog. Back in 1975 […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: